🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive power on both forehand and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that very last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {